Although Slack is definitively undefinable, can we come any closer to understanding it using science?
The scope of scientific endeavor has been restrained by the dogmas of naive realism and materialism, and the study of experience could be the new way forward.
How philosophical idealists, non-materialists and the spiritually-inclined all miss their own mark by constantly talking about energy.
Many people use 'logic, reason & rationality' to justify their beliefs by mistaking attempts to think critically with objectivity itself.
The belief that absolute truths exist leads to the subjugation of individuals and groups, whereby a re-evaluation of truth might be a necessary condition of liberation.
Busting the myth of human objectivity.